ATT Hurts Apple Customers. . . Again

It appears, via twitter, that the general consensus is AT&T’s new data plan is terrible. With the recent release of the iPad, Apple customers were lead to believe that with the 3G model they would get a relatively low cost unlimited data plan. After all, with the launch of the first iPhone, unlimited data was free standard which was bumped up to around 30 dollars a month with the release of the 3G model. Now AT&T is not only capping the amount of data in a two tiered plan, they are only extending the limit to 2gb well below the relative standard of 5gb that was expected.

The question that has been floating around for quite some time is, is this effecting sales of the Apple devices and (more importantly) is this effecting the perception of the Apple brand negatively? One thing is for sure, if and when apple allows multiple carriers for iPhone and iPad there will be a mass exodus of consumer from the AT&T carrier.

Mobile Marketing

Before the iPhone there was nothing but a void.

The question is, will the mobile market truly serve as a viable arena to truly leverage and sell more product in the future? As an iPhone user and designer myself it seems that the average user goes through three phases of iPhone use including junky, clean up and utility.

Personally I have never been sold on a product on my iPhone as of yet. The future of the apps as a mobile market seems to be in leveraging services. Through making a service fully or partially mobile on one’s phone and being hyper utilitarian you can create a greater hook on keeping a consumer.

So apps can certainly pro-long and enhance a current relationship with a brand/service; but, could it ever create that desire solely on mobile? With the oversaturation of the app store, it seems that the chance of that happening is slim to none.

Headin' to Arkansas

If an ad agency makes a great ad; but, it's hitting the wrong target is it really that bad?

I think thats a question that hangs in the air whenever an advertisement seems to be off key from a brand perspective. Of course, being way out of left field, hitting the wrong gender, race and age all at once would be too far off and would most likely dilute the brand by sending out too many and contradictory messages. However, how close to brand is too "close to brand."

When a client is obsessing where the toys came from, be it Target or Wal-Mart (which is the same exact toy), in a kid's fast food ad because their target consume is considered a wal-mart-like shopper. Is that going too far and isn't that obsessing too much over details that could detract from the big picture?

The subject came up when discussing the new memorable Caribou Coffee ads on youtube made by Colle + McVoy. The ads have a sometimes violent or disgusting sense of humor that feels more apt for a teenager and yet their audience tends to be middle aged, stay at home mom's.

You be the judge:

Caribou's "The Autumn Adventure of Jack & Gourdo #5"

Agency: Colle + McVoy

Reason: A well-made, dry sense of humor that plays with boundaries of acceptability; but, may be off the key consumer.

On a side note: I am happy to report that after being unemployed for a total of 12 day (8 work days), I received a job offer from an excellent, quickly growing agency Rockfish Interactive. They not only create great websites, innovative back-end tools, iPhone apps and social media tools; but, they also launch brands and were named "Best Small Agency of the Year" by Ad Age.

So I will be heading out on a road trip to Arkansas to check out the state and the agency in person. Look for posts on Thursday of traveling pics. . . y'all (thought I'd get started on my accent conversion).